CHINA PEPTIDESUPPLIERSINDEPENDENT INDUSTRY DIRECTORY

Evidence methodology / Draft version 1.0

A score must be reproducible.

Evidence scores measure the depth and traceability of public disclosure. They do not measure product quality, legal compliance, delivery performance, or commercial reliability.

Migration notice

Current scores are provisional.

The directory's existing scores predate this versioned rubric. They are displayed as provisional while source-level records are rebuilt and rescored. A score should not be treated as final until its profile shows criterion-level evidence and a methodology version.

This disclosure is intentional: publishing an unsupported appearance of precision would be less reliable than showing the current limitation.

100-point rubric

Disclosure depth, not endorsement.

  1. Traceable company identity15 points

    Official domain, consistent company identity, and identifiable operating entity.

  2. Operating location10 points

    Public city, region, facility, or office information relevant to the listed activity.

  3. Manufacturing disclosure20 points

    Specific public statements about production activity, facilities, equipment, or manufacturing workflow.

  4. Quality and regulatory disclosure20 points

    Traceable quality-system, regulatory, inspection, filing, or certificate information.

  5. Capability specificity15 points

    Detailed products, technologies, development stages, modifications, or service scope.

  6. Analytical documentation10 points

    Public analytical methods, example reports, specifications, or testing documentation.

  7. Independent corroboration5 points

    Relevant evidence from a regulator, exchange, academic, conference, or reputable trade source.

  8. Freshness and correction path5 points

    Dated current information and a usable route for corrections or confirmation.

Review workflow

From discovery to correction.

01

Discover

Identify a traceable company identity and relevant peptide-sector activity.

02

Source

Attach official material first, then seek independent corroboration.

03

Classify

Separate manufacturing disclosures from research supply and distribution activity.

04

Publish and correct

Show uncertainty, review dates, source links, confirmation status, and documented changes.

Methodology feedback

Send evidence-standard feedback to [email protected].